from the poster presented at the Society of American Archivists Annual Meeting, August 2014, Washington, D.C.
by Annalise Berdini, Steven Duckworth, Jessica Hoffman, Alina Josan, Amanda Mita, & Evan Peugh; Philadelphia Area Consortium of Special Collections Libraries (PACSCL)
PACSCL’s current project, “Uncovering Philadelphia’s Past: A Regional Solution to Revealing Hidden Collections,” will process 46 high research value collections, totaling 1,539 linear feet, from 16 Philadelphia-area institutions that document life in the region. Since the start of processing in October 2013, the team has completed 31 collections at 13 repositories, totaling over 1,225 linear feet. Plans have evolved over the course of the project due to previous processing in many collections. As the processing teams tackled the collections, the solutions devised for the various challenges they encountered developed into a helpful body of information regarding minimal processing. Future archivists and collaborators can use this knowledge to choose appropriate collections for minimal processing projects, and be prepared to handle unexpected challenges as they arise.
- Novice Archivists: Volunteers and novice archivists, while well meaning, can make simple mistakes that lead to larger problems.
- Learn about the previous processors; their background and level of knowledge with the materials. Having a better idea of their relationship to the collection helps guide decisions in the new iteration of processing.
- “Miscellaneous.” It is a very popular word, even with seasoned archivists. Attempts should be made to more accurately describe the contents of a folder, such as “Assorted records” or “Correspondence, assorted,” followed by examples of record types or 1 to 3 names of individuals represented.
- Losing Original Order: Processors with good intentions can disrupt original order through poor arrangement, item-level processing, and removing items for exhibits or other purposes.
- Use what original order remains to influence arrangement in a way that might bring separated records back together.
- Lone items may require more detailed description to provide links back to other documents.
- Be aware of handwriting: Previous folder titling can serve as a clue for separated items and original order.
- Item-Level Description: Item-level description can render the collection’s original order impossible to discern and greatly diminish access.
- Gain a broad perspective of the collection in order to determine the most intelligible arrangement of materials with an awareness of grouping like with like.
- For item-level reference materials, such as newspaper and magazine clippings, merge materials into larger subject files and include a rough date span.
- Be cautious when merging other records, such as correspondence. Arrange materials into a loose chronological order and include in the folder title the names of recurring correspondents, if possible.
- Make sure to account for the new arrangement in one’s arrangement note. Reuniting item-level materials and describing those materials to the new level of arrangement will greatly enhance access to the collection.
- Legacy Finding Aids: It can be difficult to tell how accurate an existing finding aid is, and the decisions made on how much of it to preserve can be complicated.
- Again, knowledge of the previous processors’ education and history with the collection will prove helpful.
- Consider the fate of the legacy finding aid. If the collection will be entirely reprocessed, is anything in the legacy finding aid worth keeping? Should the old and new simply be linked or should parts of the old finding aid be incorporated into the new one?
- Proofread! Anything retained from a legacy finding aid should be proofread very carefully.
- Keep ideas of continuity in mind while creating new folder titles and dates.
- Format can be a problem. Will the format (e.g., hardcopy only) prove problematic for import? Scanning and OCR can be a time-consuming process.
- Collection Size and Type: Size and type of collection can have a drastic impact on processing speeds.
- If possible, choose larger collections to economize on time and money. Multiple smaller collections require more effort than one larger one.
- Institutional records average a faster processing speed than family or personal papers. Keep this in mind when choosing which collections to process.
- Work closely with current staff; understand the history of the collection and the desired shape of its future.
- Learn about previous processors to understand their training, background, and history with the records.
- Edit and expand upon non-descriptive terms (e.g., miscellaneous) when possible. More detailed descriptions can assist in linking separated records back together.
- Merge clippings and reference files together when feasible.
- Make note of reprocessing decisions in the finding aid.
- Proofread any reused documents or folder titles, keeping ideas of consistency in mind.
- Be mindful of donor relationships in discussing past problems, especially in any public forum, such as a project blog.
- Plan carefully from the outset. If possible, choose collections that best fit the project goals.
- Remain flexible and be prepared to compromise.